Central Ohio Optometric Association
Newsletter from OOA Third Party Committee
1st Quarter 2011 This quarterly Newsletter from the OOA Third PartyCommittee includes third party topics of interest to OOA members. Let usknow if there is a topic you think should be included. William Rudy, OD,Chair; Nathan Bjork, OD; Heath Gilbert, OD; Larry Gill, OD; Steve Hansen, OD;Jay Henry, OD; Michael Ringel, OD; Dave Shilling, OD; Steve Shroder, OD;Eric Stocker, OD; Brent Swartz, OD; Richard Cornett.While the OOA represents ALL optometrists in the State of Ohio, the ThirdParty Committee deals with issues that affect Ohio optometrists and theirrelationship with third party payors. The OOA cannot and will not recommendpolicy on how individual optometrists sign up for various third partycontracts. Each OD should consider their unique situation, the third partycontract, and their mode of practice individually before deciding to enrollin a plan. If a third party payor is acting outside of the contractparameters or outside state or federal law, send an email to the OOA withdetails so the Third Party Committee can investigate. In the past, theThird Party Committee has tried to deal with problems that OOA members havewith insurance payors after a member experiences a problem. In other words,the Third Party Committee has been retroactive and "put out fires" afterthey arose. This year the committee is trying to distribute information toOOA members to educate and to inform. We, the Third Party Committee, wantthese emails to inform Ohio optometrists regarding third party issues. Hereare a few current topics:VSP and Costco:http://www.visionmonday.com/ViewContent/tabid/211/content_id/26393/Default.aspxhttp://www.revoptom.com/content/c/24986/VSP started a pilot program that allows Costco to sell contact lenses andsome optical goods directly to VSP members without the hassle of patientreimbursement. Ohio optometrists report to the OOA that their patientshave used VSP benefits to purchase CLs through Costco. According to a VSPrep, some large potential employee groups are refusing to allow VSP to bidfor vision contracts without a national retail component. Costco was chosenbecause they were already VSP's largest out-of-network provider. Costco wasonly given the privilege to verify patient eligibility electronically andfile claims electronically. They are still out of network and reimbursed asan out of network provider. However, VSP doctors have complained thatCostco is selling the CLs directly to the consumer at the same price asin-network providers. This pilot program has met with significant VSPprovider controversy since historically, VSP has aligned themselves withprivate practice, not "retail" or "commercial" settings. In the past, inorder to be a VSP provider, the optometrist had to own a majority of theoptical supply and was required to carry certain frames. Aligning withCostco, a large corporation that has independent doctors of optometry andwho have no financial tie to optical sales, is a departure from previousVSP policy. VSP reps again stress that this is a pilot plan that is basedon economic environment or market forces. To be competitive with today'schanging health care network, VSP must alter its policy in order to keep upwith demand. The thought is that network providers will benefit with moreclients in the VSP network instead of networks that cater solely to largeoptical chains. VSP has 55 million VSP vision care members in its networkin 2011 which is up from 40 million in 2008.VSP and eyeconic.com:http://www.sightnation.com/news/vsp-global-test-online-optical-store-eyeconiccomVSP has also launched an online optical component to compete with the trendof online optical sales. The eyeconic website recognizes that VSP providersmay have concerns with promoting the new mode of optical sales: "We've heardand understand the concern doctors have regarding online sales, especiallythe fear of reducing patient visits..." The VSP statement goes on to statethat eyeconic.com will be "the right online partner for independent eyecareproviders" by offering "a virtual extension of their dispensary."Eyeconic.com and VSP's online optical sales went live February 18, 2011.Medicare/Medicaid and Refractions: http://codes.ohio.gov/oac/5101:3-6Ohio optometrists are reporting that most Ohio Medicaid and Medicaid HMOsare not paying for Refraction 92015 separately than eye codes comprehensive920x4 or intermediate 920x2 codes. Some optometrists were reporting thatMolina (OH Medicaid HMO) WAS paying for refractions regardless of other92xxx codes, but a recent report stated they had recently changed thispolicy as directed by Ohio Medicaid. Most Medicaid branches consider that92015 is bundled into eye codes 920x4/920x2. Ohio Medicaid and someMedicaid HMOs are paying for 92015 when billed in conjunction with E/Mmedical codes 99xxx. However, a medical diagnosis and treatment is neededto justify a 99xxx code to be billed. Also, eyecare providers should beaware that some Ohio Medicaid third party payors will only pay for ONE92xxx code in a 2- year period and this includes Refraction 92015.Therefore, if a provider does bill a 92015 in conjunction with a 99213(E/M level 3 established) then that patient's Medicaid vision benefits havebeen used and Medicaid will deny any 92014 or 92012 CPT codes for a certainperiod. Medicare has historically considered 92015 refractions an allowable,non-covered item. Doctors can bill patients directly for this service sinceit is not "bundled" in an eye exam code or E/M code. Historically, therefraction fee has been approximately 20% of a doctor's comprehensive 920x4code, but there seem to be no written recommendations, only historicaldata. Interestingly, Medicare REQUIRES that a refraction (to establish abest corrected vision (BCVA)) be performed within 3 months of cataractsurgery, but Medicare does not cover the fee. When Medicaid is asecondary insurance of Medicare, Medicaid still follows their interpretationthat 92015 is bundled into 920x4 or 920x2 even though the primary Medicarestates that it is not bundled into those CPTs. Questions have arisen in thecurrent (2012-13) state budget regarding Medicaid as “secondary.” The OOAhas asked for clarification on this matter.Medicare Switch from Palmettoto Cigna: website: http://www.cignagovernmentservices.com/J15/Ohio Medicare will be switching from Palmetto to Cigna. The OOA is hard atwork trying to build new ties with Cigna. Unfortunately, many largeinsurance companies do not understand today's optometry. Also, the Medicareguidelines can be interpreted in different ways so we expect some earlymisunderstanding and unfortunately denials in the coming months. Pleaseknow that the OOA is trying to be proactive and establish a good workingrelationship with Cigna.UAWDr. Peter Agnone, Michigan optometrist, reports that United Auto Workersretired workers and their dependents will now have access to theiroptometrists for medical eye care beginning April, 1, 2011.Blue Cross/ Blue Shield of Michigan is the administrator for the UAWRetiree Medical Benefits Trust. The “Trust” provides health care benefitsfor retired UAW members of General Motors, Ford and Chrysler, along withtheir eligible dependents. Currently, the Trust provides health carebenefits to more than 860,000 persons. This is good news for the UAWworkers. This change of policy by the UAW Trust decision makers will besignificant and helpful as I continue my discussions with the autocompanies for access to optometrists for all autoworkers. Please feel freeto disperse this information to our members as you see fit. BC/BS willannounce this change in their April “The Record” bulletin that goes out toall providers.
Next Meeting is on Thursday Feb 23rd at 6pm (Dinner 6:30) at Polaris Grill.
Columbus/Chillicothe VA Residents will present 2hr of CE on "Oral Med Review: When Drops Just Don't Cut It". RSVP to dieter.sarah.od@gmail.com
Central Ohio Optometric Association